<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Adobe Photoshop Express Have everything Realtors Need?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: createmo</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/#comment-54079</link>
		<dc:creator>createmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 04:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/#comment-54079</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your website ;-)
I made on photoshop backgrounds for myspace and youtube and whatever
my backgrounds:http://tinyurl.com/6r7cav
have a great day and thank you again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your website <img src='http://www.geekestateblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I made on photoshop backgrounds for myspace and youtube and whatever<br />
my backgrounds:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6r7cav" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6r7cav</a><br />
have a great day and thank you again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/#comment-9789</link>
		<dc:creator>Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/#comment-9789</guid>
		<description>The shot would have been even better had it been taken from the same place, but zoomed in enough to eliminate the walls &amp; banister altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shot would have been even better had it been taken from the same place, but zoomed in enough to eliminate the walls &amp; banister altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealBird</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/#comment-9780</link>
		<dc:creator>RealBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/does-adobe-photoshop-express-have-everything-realtors-need/#comment-9780</guid>
		<description>I like your case study approach. Express is pretty neat Flex magic from Adobe. It has more tools for photo touch-ups than Picnik, but requires more clicks to achieve simple tasks. There are clearly different markets which requires different functionalities. Consumer photo editing, sharing (Adobe Photoshop Express, Picassa Web), photo touch-ups for online and print publications (Photoshop Express and desktop Adobe tools) and photo editing for bloggers and other online activities where speed of use is crucial (Picnik).

I will stick with Picnik for the time being for editing screenshots and photos for blog posts. It is still the quickest way to achieve good quality output. The speed I can complete a task with Picnik is unbeatable. I guess it&#039;s going to be a feature race now between these players.

Thanks

-- Zoltan
http://realbird.typepad.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your case study approach. Express is pretty neat Flex magic from Adobe. It has more tools for photo touch-ups than Picnik, but requires more clicks to achieve simple tasks. There are clearly different markets which requires different functionalities. Consumer photo editing, sharing (Adobe Photoshop Express, Picassa Web), photo touch-ups for online and print publications (Photoshop Express and desktop Adobe tools) and photo editing for bloggers and other online activities where speed of use is crucial (Picnik).</p>
<p>I will stick with Picnik for the time being for editing screenshots and photos for blog posts. It is still the quickest way to achieve good quality output. The speed I can complete a task with Picnik is unbeatable. I guess it&#8217;s going to be a feature race now between these players.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>&#8211; Zoltan<br />
<a href="http://realbird.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://realbird.typepad.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 529/544 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.geekestateblog.com @ 2012-02-09 16:05:59 -->
