<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Realtors Property Resource Be A Game Changer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Breeders</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-152770</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Breeders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-152770</guid>
		<description>It is good but I want to know more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good but I want to know more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Breeders</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-149482</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Breeders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-149482</guid>
		<description>It is good but I want to know more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good but I want to know more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewmeyers</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147122</link>
		<dc:creator>drewmeyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147122</guid>
		<description>No, Justin did not delete the comments - for some reason they got caught in SPAM. I just approved your 2nd comment and now it&#039;s showing up on this thread. Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Justin did not delete the comments &#8211; for some reason they got caught in SPAM. I just approved your 2nd comment and now it&#39;s showing up on this thread. Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecline</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147116</link>
		<dc:creator>joecline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147116</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin,&lt;br&gt;Just curious, did you delete my comments, that I left for Reggie of&lt;br&gt;Cyberhomes? I responded to his comment with a longer comment twice and it&lt;br&gt;was deleted shortly there after.If you would direct Tracy to this post she&lt;br&gt;can join in with Reggie and I. I&#039;m really concerned, possibly unjustifiably,&lt;br&gt;but concerned nonetheless about the direction the RPR is taking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joecline.com/blog/2010/02/16/rpr-proponents-its-good-its-free-trust-us/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.joecline.com/blog/2010/02/16/rpr-pro...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin,<br />Just curious, did you delete my comments, that I left for Reggie of<br />Cyberhomes? I responded to his comment with a longer comment twice and it<br />was deleted shortly there after.If you would direct Tracy to this post she<br />can join in with Reggie and I. I&#39;m really concerned, possibly unjustifiably,<br />but concerned nonetheless about the direction the RPR is taking.<br /><a href="http://www.joecline.com/blog/2010/02/16/rpr-proponents-its-good-its-free-trust-us/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joecline.com/blog/2010/02/16/rpr-pro&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Thanks<br />Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147113</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147113</guid>
		<description>This is a good point, this is an extra added value for Realtors. You will not pay extra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point, this is an extra added value for Realtors. You will not pay extra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147114</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147114</guid>
		<description>Joe, I saw your questions over at Inman. I&#039;ll email them to Tracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I saw your questions over at Inman. I&#39;ll email them to Tracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecline</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-173769</link>
		<dc:creator>joecline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-173769</guid>
		<description>Hi Reggie, 
I can only assume that the RPR team is not working for free and if that is the case, then NAR, and the membership by proxy, is paying for the effort to make RPR happen. 

In addition, it seems like NAR has already spent money in the acquisition of &quot;technology&quot; (as per http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2009/11/tech_property). From nar.org: &quot;The technology acquisition includes licensed data and secured data aggregation services from LPS Real Estate Group, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lender Processing Services Inc. (NYSE:LPS), a leader in real estate technology.&quot;

I suppose part of this technology acquisition included people since RPR is now two Cyberhomes high ups are now on the management team for RPR. Again, I can only assume they are being paid by the membership? 

Lastly, the local aspect of it is tenuous at best. As I mentioned in the comment above, I already know where to go to get info for the 10 counties around where I do business. All agents already know this. You need tax data, hit the central appraisal district, you need zoning help, the development center for the city or municipality serving the property, if you want flood data, there&#039;s a GIS system for that. 

Since I live here, I already pay for these services in my taxes. Why pay for them to be developed again by NAR for a national scope, when no agents that I&#039;m aware of sell nationally?? Why pay my MLS to have tech folks to support the feeds, why pay national to employ folks to work on it?, Why incur the opportunity cost for other projects that could help our image over another proprietary database that the public can just complain about being more of the same realtors trying to have a monopoly on the market?? I mean who knows, maybe that&#039;s the plan. Use member fees to build the product, let the DOJ complain, then go to the membership telling us that you&#039;re now required to open it up to the public. 

Sorry to be so skeptical, but in my 7 years as a REALTOR, I&#039;ve not been all that impressed with the technology direction of NAR as it related to members. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Reggie,<br />
I can only assume that the RPR team is not working for free and if that is the case, then NAR, and the membership by proxy, is paying for the effort to make RPR happen. </p>
<p>In addition, it seems like NAR has already spent money in the acquisition of &#8220;technology&#8221; (as per <a href="http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2009/11/tech_property" rel="nofollow">http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2009/11/tech_property</a>). From nar.org: &#8220;The technology acquisition includes licensed data and secured data aggregation services from LPS Real Estate Group, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lender Processing Services Inc. (NYSE:LPS), a leader in real estate technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>I suppose part of this technology acquisition included people since RPR is now two Cyberhomes high ups are now on the management team for RPR. Again, I can only assume they are being paid by the membership? </p>
<p>Lastly, the local aspect of it is tenuous at best. As I mentioned in the comment above, I already know where to go to get info for the 10 counties around where I do business. All agents already know this. You need tax data, hit the central appraisal district, you need zoning help, the development center for the city or municipality serving the property, if you want flood data, there&#8217;s a GIS system for that. </p>
<p>Since I live here, I already pay for these services in my taxes. Why pay for them to be developed again by NAR for a national scope, when no agents that I&#8217;m aware of sell nationally?? Why pay my MLS to have tech folks to support the feeds, why pay national to employ folks to work on it?, Why incur the opportunity cost for other projects that could help our image over another proprietary database that the public can just complain about being more of the same realtors trying to have a monopoly on the market?? I mean who knows, maybe that&#8217;s the plan. Use member fees to build the product, let the DOJ complain, then go to the membership telling us that you&#8217;re now required to open it up to the public. </p>
<p>Sorry to be so skeptical, but in my 7 years as a REALTOR, I&#8217;ve not been all that impressed with the technology direction of NAR as it related to members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecline</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147090</link>
		<dc:creator>joecline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147090</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin! I&#039;m still waiting on all the good reasons. :) (BUT I can be won over if I hear some compelling information.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin! I&#39;m still waiting on all the good reasons. <img src='http://www.geekestateblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (BUT I can be won over if I hear some compelling information.)</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Nicolay</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147087</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie Nicolay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147087</guid>
		<description>Joe thank you for taking the time to express your concern.  I&#039;m the Director of Social Media for RPR and wanted to share a few facts about the project. The RPR will not &quot;resell&quot; members as you mention above.  Rather the RPR will be offered as a member benefit...and members will not pay an additional subscription, enhancement, etc to use the product. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also don&#039;t get stuck on the national aspect. Sure the RPR will be nationwide, but think of it as local in application...just without local borders. Members will gain access to a new level of sophisticated reporting for use with clients that melds MLS data with other key data such as tax assessments, liens, zoning, permits, environmental, neighborhood, schools and community demographics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe thank you for taking the time to express your concern.  I&#39;m the Director of Social Media for RPR and wanted to share a few facts about the project. The RPR will not &#8220;resell&#8221; members as you mention above.  Rather the RPR will be offered as a member benefit&#8230;and members will not pay an additional subscription, enhancement, etc to use the product. </p>
<p>Also don&#39;t get stuck on the national aspect. Sure the RPR will be nationwide, but think of it as local in application&#8230;just without local borders. Members will gain access to a new level of sophisticated reporting for use with clients that melds MLS data with other key data such as tax assessments, liens, zoning, permits, environmental, neighborhood, schools and community demographics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.geekestateblog.com/will-realtors-property-resource-be-a-game-changer/#comment-147075</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekestateblog.com/?p=3880#comment-147075</guid>
		<description>Aloha Joe, I can understand your skepticism. I too have my questions about RPR. However, I see a lot of good reasons for it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloha Joe, I can understand your skepticism. I too have my questions about RPR. However, I see a lot of good reasons for it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 613/631 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.geekestateblog.com @ 2012-02-09 15:10:56 -->
